Jodi Dean on Communicative Capitalism

Jody Dean, sharp, sharpest as always [for the Communist Horizon]

"We are told that democracy thrives on engagement, that it requires near universal participation by voters in bi- or quadrennial elections. In this video, Jodi Dean critiques neoliberal democratic “participation” as a moment of capture and diffusion of political sentiment.Dean suggests that while we may seek to deploy and define “democracy against capitalism” (as Ellen Meiksins Wood has said, and as Chantal Mouffe will attempt later in this series), we need to consider equally how democratic expression is coopted by its own platforms. In “communicative capitalism,” participation paradoxically serves to depoliticize the participant and to estrange them from a sense of collective possibility, burrowing deeper into an individualized politics. Dean’s lecture suggests that the terms on which we engage democracy must change, considering capital’s increasing commodification of communication and sociality itself. Otherwise, political expression merely increases the value generated and unequally distributed by capitalist networks.

An important part of Dean’s argument is that democracy operates within capitalism not so much as a series of ideals or as a political structure but as a kind of “drive” that can be exploited. The more complex this network becomes, the more effective it is at channeling political expression into a repetitive loop. Diabolically, the “democratic drive” is used to divert us from democratic politics".  

From Democatix, January 17, 2018 Curated by Becket Mingwen

Brazil general strike: Behind the media silence

Brazil General Strike: Behind the Media Silence 

Watch video: We examine why Brazil's media outlets treated a national strike that paralysed much of the country as a non-story.

http://fw.to/KX9FYVH

Last week, hundreds of thousands of Brazilians took to the streets and millions more stayed home in a general strike. Airports, factories, schools, public services were all shut down.

Last year, a different set of protests brought down a different government - that of former President Dilma Rousseff. But last year's demonstrations got wall-to-wall coverage in Brazil's privately-owned news outlets - including Globo, which is as dominant a TV presence as you will find in any country.

The subsequent impeachment of Rousseff paved the way for the current president, Michel Temer, whose austerity-based response to an economic recession led to the general strike last week.

But this time around Globo and other media outlets don't seem to find the protest story quite so compelling.

"The gulf in coverage is vast. The protests calling for impeachment against the Dilma government had huge visibility, with Globo's helicopter capturing the protest from the air and covering it all day long. With protests against Michel Temer, this doesn't exist," says journalist Joao Filho of The Intercept Brasil.

"When it came to the general strike the word 'strike' was avoided - they talk only about demonstrations, protests and vandalism," Filho says.

So why did the media treat the two strikes differently?

Critics suggest that's because right-wing media outlets prefer Temer and his austerity programme to Rousseff and her leftist predecessor Lula da Silva - and the social programmes that they brought in.

Another factor might be that Temer's government has been using taxpayers' money to persuade the news media to support his conservative agenda.

Like Globo, Brazil's other major networks, SBT and Record are family-owned or controlled - and their proprietors tend to tilt to the right politically, which is reflected in the coverage their platforms provide.

"The Temer government is buying editorial support. It's not simply increasing advertising funds, no - it's exchanging advertising funds for editorial support," says Filho. 

Interestingly, "strikers and demonstrators were never interviewed; our arguments for the general strike were never heard. The mainstream media clearly had an editorial tendency to discredit the strike," says Adriana Magalhaes, a press officer representing the United Workers' Central.

With multiple investigations into corruption, economic reforms affecting future pension cheques, state spending on advertising and where that money goes, the Brazilian political story is a complicated one. The story of the media reporting on it, really isn't.

Contributors:
Vladimir Goitia, financial journalist
Joao Filho, journalist, The Intercept Brasil
Adriana Magalhaes, press officer, United Workers' Central
Joao Feres, media analyst

Post Truth discrepancies

The NORM means the discrepancy between what normally takes place in distinct 'scenes', 'arrangements', 'desiring-productions', processes and recordings of the psycho-social-virtual body and what is actually reported, disseminated and transmitted  
The CUT. 
It concerns everything. 
It screams LIE.

Who put you in prison?

Post Truth is just another ancient lie.

Hospice of Barbacena, Minas Gerais, Brazil 1972